Error: Your upload path is not valid or does not exist: /nas/content/live/origintdr/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files In-House Interrogatory

In-House Interrogatory

In-House Interrogatory

Listen to this article

Asked: Our weekly question to the In-House community

The Supreme Court of last month made a decision in favor of the community.

The court ruled that attorney-client privilege still exists in a business transaction after exchanging legal advice during negotiations, Corporate Counsel reported.

The case dealt with three shopping mall companies who shared legal advice during business transactions on a partnership agreement. Each company obtained advice from their respective attorneys and talked about it with each other.

The plaintiffs argued the defendants waived attorney-client privileges by talking about this with each other.

Though a trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and a state appeals court upheld the ruling, the state supreme court overturned it.

So, here’s our question for you:

Do you agree with the state supreme court’s decision? Does sharing legal knowledge during a business transaction waive attorney-client privilege?

Leave a comment below or email me.

Need to Know:

Follow us on Twitter for In-House news and discussion: @TDRInHouse